Low social mobility equals success

At Gene Expression, Razib Khan writes:

[T]he logical end point of a quasi-”blank slate” policy position is the diminution of environmental impacts so that only genes matter


If it turns out that the heritability of intelligence is relatively high in the developed world, then it may be that the Left-progressive project of ameliorating class based differences in access to cognitively enhancing environments has succeeded to a large extent. Barring genetic engineering this is the “end of history” for this project. It is a matter of when, not if (i.e., if you reject that the project has hit sharply diminishing marginal returns, logically it should at some point if the Left-progressive project succeeds). Assortative mating and more transparent meritocracy should allow for cleaner sorting within the population, and inter-generational class churn should decrease and stabilize at a basal level dictated by the random environmental variables which no amount of social engineering can squeeze out of the system. A perfect meritocracy would replace cultural class with biological caste.

A decrease in social mobility would signify the project’s success. I expect this contrasts with one of the primary measures of success for those who hold the blank slate policy position. Will they use an indicator of their success to argue that opportunity (in an environmental sense) is becoming less equal?

2 thoughts on “Low social mobility equals success

  1. Important to note;
    The genetic component of inheritability of IQ is probably very small. No gene-variants of high QI have been identified (i.e. the association between genes and IQ is small and/or depend on very many genes). Also, it has been shown that childrens IQ is basically only inherited on their mothers side – intelligent mothers have intelligent children. If it would have been a genetic inheritance, then the fathers IQ would play a larger role.

    So, what determines a child’s IQ? The largest determinants are the mothers IQ and education and the family’s socioeconomic position, where a low socioeconomic position is a determinant for low IQ. (How? what are the mechanisms? Probably some kind of epigenetics is involved). The Left-Progressive Project would be to minimize the proportion of people with low socioeconomic status, thus increasing the over all cognitive abilities of a population. Just sayin.

Comments welcome

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s