Humans 1, Chimps 0: Correcting the Record

Author

Jason Collins

Published

July 25, 2024

In 2012, I wrote a post titled Chimps 1, Humans 0 after seeing videos of a chimp named Ayumu. Ayumu could recall the location of numbers, in order, flashed briefly on a screen. Ayumu’s performance far exceeded my feeble attempts. See the below videos to get a sense of the task.

The human

Ayumu

This performance, documented by Inoue and Matsuzawa (2007) in Current Biology, was used to assert that chimps have superior working memory to humans. The claim has spread widely, as a brief search on Twitter and Google shows.

When I wrote that post, I didn’t know that this conclusion was already without basis. Here’s Peter Cook and Margaret Wilson (2010a) in Science:

Ayumu received extensive practice on the task; the humans to whom he was compared received none. At least one subsequent study (2) shows that, with even very moderate practice, humans can match Ayumu’s performance.

In spite of this basic methodological error, the claim of superior spatial working memory in chimpanzees has been widely and uncritically repeated in the popular and scientific media. Propagation of this incorrect idea distracts from more fruitful explorations of chimpanzee memory and undermines ongoing research into human and primate evolution.

The paper referenced at (2) was by Silberberg and Kearns (2009), who found that trained people could match Ayumu’s performance. Cook and Wilson (2010b) subsequently trained two university students to a level superior to the chimpanzee. A more recent literature review by Read et al. (2022) suggested that chimp working memory matches that of 4 to 5-year-old humans. However, at around two digits (plus or minus one), chimp working memory falls short of adult human performance. (Read et al. also question whether this task is even a test of working memory.)

Putting it together, the initial claim of superior working memory doesn’t hold up. Ayumu’s performance is impressive at first sight, but that’s about it.

*Someone brought this to my attention back in November (that’s the date on my note to blog this), but I can’t remember who!

References

Cook, P., and Wilson, M. (2010a). In practice, chimp memory study flawed. Science, 328(5983), 1228–1228. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.328.5983.1228-c
Cook, P., and Wilson, M. (2010b). Do young chimpanzees have extraordinary working memory? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(4), 599–600. https://doi.org/10.3758/pbr.17.4.599
Inoue, S., and Matsuzawa, T. (2007). Working memory of numerals in chimpanzees. Current Biology, 17(23), R1004–R1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.027
Read, D. W., Manrique, H. M., and Walker, M. J. (2022). On the working memory of humans and great apes: Strikingly similar or remarkably different? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 134, 104496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.12.019
Silberberg, A., and Kearns, D. (2009). Memory for the order of briefly presented numerals in humans as a function of practice. Animal Cognition, 12(2), 405–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0206-8